Vital Football

Latest Burnley FC News

Can We Eckersley Like Agree a Fee!

Can We Eckersley Like Agree a Fee!

The Clarets signed Richard Eckersley from Manchester United in the summer but have yet to agree a fee for the defender.

Eckersley is aged 20 so the Bosman Ruling rules related to compensation applies.

If players are under 23, then the club losing out are entitled to compensation and if a fee can't be agreed between the clubs then the matter is decided at a tribunal.

Manchester United despite all their money would appear to be digging their heels in for a large amount of compo; one that the Clarets are not prepared to pay. It therefore looks like the only alternative will be to go to a tribunal, probably something both clubs, certainly Burnley would not have wanted to do.

It is pure speculation but the Clarets value of the player is beleived to be in the order of £250,000 whereas United are believed to have a figure nearer £2 million in mind.

Chief Executive, Paul Fletcher speaking to the Lancashire Telegraph about the situation said:

"There`s a reasonable chance it will go to a tribunal. We`re not a million miles apart on a fee, but it is a sizeable distance. It`s all down to people`s opinions.Right the way through, everything we do at the football club we back our manager. He sees him as one figure, and Manchester United see him as another, and we`ve valued him as a lot less than they have. We just hope that, if it does go to a tribunal, that we get a fair judgement."

Eckersley turned down the offer of a new contract at Manchester United instead preferring to get a better chance of first team action in the top flight with Burnley. He signed a four-year deal but has yet to breakthrough into the Clarets first team being seen as more of a long-term prospect.

He made his debut in the Carling Cup second round game at Hartlepool, a match we won 2-1 after coming from behind. It was not a good night for Eckersley though having been sent-off after picking up two yellows.

There is better news on David Edgar, who is in a similar situation after signing in ther close season from Newcastle. Fletcher indicated they are close to agreeing a fee with a tribunal not looking necessary.



*Try Vital Mobile FOR FREE for the latest news, scores, fixtures and so much more*

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:turfmanphil
Date:Wednesday September 16 2009
Time: 12:35PM

Comments

0
Bloody stingy Man U!! Grrrrrrrrrrrr
turfmanphil
16/09/2009 12:42:00
0
If we had only budgeted say £500k for his signing - and the tribunal says £2m - What happens? Are we stuck with it?
Claretdale
16/09/2009 13:15:00
0
Yep, I think so and I would be worried that a tribunal would be scared of upsetting the mighty Man U but we shall see
turfmanphil
16/09/2009 13:21:00
0
It does concern me a little. When you buy something it is usually related to price. ie. I am happy to go to Liverpool for £36, but not for £136. Surely this is the same? We are happy to buy RE for £500k, but not for £2m! Should this not have been sorted out earlier?
Claretdale
16/09/2009 13:43:00
0
Guess this is just standard procedure for Man U, lets face it they are in terrible debt compared to BFC but the FA etc let them get away with it! Probably not sour grapes after we beat them but I suspect this has more to do with lawyers and big business rather than Sir Alex's wishes. I am not sure BFC would have budgetted low for this one, they probably knew they might have to pay up to £2 m but hoped they could negotiate downwards
turfmanphil
16/09/2009 14:00:00
0
Tmp speaks wise words, methinks. I would be surprised, no shocked, if Bfc's lawyers hadn't advised the Bfc Board to budget for the worst and hope for the best. But who knows? Meanwhile, it occurs to me that we may have seen less of both Eck and Ed to date than would have been the case if these negotiations had already been concluded. Sitting them on the bench may have been a deliberate stance of saying we 'we are pleased to have them, but not THAT pleased'. As they used to say in Burnley... lawd knows.
Couch Potato
16/09/2009 15:46:00
0
I am not surprised about this news I think it was inevitable!
8clarets8
16/09/2009 17:38:00
0
I think if you take what we paid for Chrissy Eagles from the same club and then look at this signing I would rule a fee of £683,000. Worked out with amazing mathematical equations and reverse logic. Simples!!!
VinRogue
17/09/2009 13:06:00
0
Do I need a slide rule? ;-)
turfmanphil
17/09/2009 17:08:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Burnley Articles

Instant Reactions - Burnley v Stoke City (12/12/17)

Following today's clash between Burnley and Stoke City, here are the instant reactions from both managers.

Stats: Burnley v Stoke City

All the stats from Burnley (1) vs (0) Stoke City, Turf Moor, 12/12/17 Att: 19,909

Burnley v Stoke - Team Sheets - 12-12-17

Burnley are at Turf Moor with Stoke the visitors for the latest Premier League game.

Burnley v Stoke - Follow On Twitter - 12-12-17

Burnley are at Turf Moor with Stoke the visitors today, this will be a 7:45pm kick-off.

Burnley Archived Articles

Vital Burnley articles from

Site Journalists

Write for Vital Burnley
Write For Vital Burnley
Apply Here

Current Poll (see more polls)

Stoke MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Pope1%
Bardsley0%
Tarkowski33%
Long0%
Ward0%
Berg Gudmundsson0%
Cork0%
Defour0%
Arfield0%
Hendrick0%
Wood0%
Sub - Taylor33%
Sub - Barnes33%
Sub - Vokes0%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites
Write for Vital Football
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
The Vital Football Members League

Recent Burnley Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Grimsby Claret10
2.cornwallclaret8
3.Portsrewart claret1
4.M.1
Vital Football Comment