UK time is: 01:49:13

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Can We Eckersley Like Agree a Fee!

The Clarets signed Richard Eckersley from Manchester United in the summer but have yet to agree a fee for the defender.

Eckersley is aged 20 so the Bosman Ruling rules related to compensation applies.

If players are under 23, then the club losing out are entitled to compensation and if a fee can't be agreed between the clubs then the matter is decided at a tribunal.

Manchester United despite all their money would appear to be digging their heels in for a large amount of compo; one that the Clarets are not prepared to pay. It therefore looks like the only alternative will be to go to a tribunal, probably something both clubs, certainly Burnley would not have wanted to do.

It is pure speculation but the Clarets value of the player is beleived to be in the order of £250,000 whereas United are believed to have a figure nearer £2 million in mind.

Chief Executive, Paul Fletcher speaking to the Lancashire Telegraph about the situation said:

"There`s a reasonable chance it will go to a tribunal. We`re not a million miles apart on a fee, but it is a sizeable distance. It`s all down to people`s opinions.Right the way through, everything we do at the football club we back our manager. He sees him as one figure, and Manchester United see him as another, and we`ve valued him as a lot less than they have. We just hope that, if it does go to a tribunal, that we get a fair judgement."

Eckersley turned down the offer of a new contract at Manchester United instead preferring to get a better chance of first team action in the top flight with Burnley. He signed a four-year deal but has yet to breakthrough into the Clarets first team being seen as more of a long-term prospect.

He made his debut in the Carling Cup second round game at Hartlepool, a match we won 2-1 after coming from behind. It was not a good night for Eckersley though having been sent-off after picking up two yellows.

There is better news on David Edgar, who is in a similar situation after signing in ther close season from Newcastle. Fletcher indicated they are close to agreeing a fee with a tribunal not looking necessary.




Seconds Out! Vital Boxing is here!

Vital F1 Prediction League - Join now for Monaco



*Try Vital Mobile FOR FREE for the latest news, scores, fixtures and so much more*

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer: turfmanphil Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday September 16 2009

Time: 12:35PM

Your Comments

Bloody stingy Man U!! Grrrrrrrrrrrr
turfmanphil
If we had only budgeted say £500k for his signing - and the tribunal says £2m - What happens? Are we stuck with it?
Claretdale
Yep, I think so and I would be worried that a tribunal would be scared of upsetting the mighty Man U but we shall see
turfmanphil
It does concern me a little. When you buy something it is usually related to price. ie. I am happy to go to Liverpool for £36, but not for £136. Surely this is the same? We are happy to buy RE for £500k, but not for £2m! Should this not have been sorted out earlier?
Claretdale
Guess this is just standard procedure for Man U, lets face it they are in terrible debt compared to BFC but the FA etc let them get away with it! Probably not sour grapes after we beat them but I suspect this has more to do with lawyers and big business rather than Sir Alex's wishes. I am not sure BFC would have budgetted low for this one, they probably knew they might have to pay up to £2 m but hoped they could negotiate downwards
turfmanphil
Tmp speaks wise words, methinks. I would be surprised, no shocked, if Bfc's lawyers hadn't advised the Bfc Board to budget for the worst and hope for the best. But who knows? Meanwhile, it occurs to me that we may have seen less of both Eck and Ed to date than would have been the case if these negotiations had already been concluded. Sitting them on the bench may have been a deliberate stance of saying we 'we are pleased to have them, but not THAT pleased'. As they used to say in Burnley... lawd knows.
Couch Potato
I am not surprised about this news I think it was inevitable!
8clarets8
I think if you take what we paid for Chrissy Eagles from the same club and then look at this signing I would rule a fee of £683,000. Worked out with amazing mathematical equations and reverse logic. Simples!!!
VinRogue
Do I need a slide rule? ;-)
turfmanphil
 

Have Your Say

Click here to register an account

Recent Articles

Archived Articles

List All Vital Burnley Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Burnley 2 - 0 Ipswich
Wolves 1 - 2 Burnley
Burnley 1 - 1 Cardiff
Leeds Utd 1 - 0 Burnley
Blackpool 1 - 0 Burnley
Burnley 3 - 1 Bristol City

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
8. Forest 46 17 16 13 4 67
9. Charlton 46 17 14 15 6 65
10. Derby County 46 16 13 17 3 61
11. Burnley 46 16 13 17 2 61
12. Birmingham 46 15 16 15 -6 61
13. Leeds Utd 46 17 10 19 -9 61
14. Ipswich 46 16 12 18 -13 60

Breaking League News

Boro track Pools ace
» Middlesbrough : 25/05/2013 16:36:00
Opposing View: Crystal Palace
» Watford : 25/05/2013 14:00:00
The Vital Forest Fan Interview: Woody
» Forest : 25/05/2013 13:09:00
Prison warders among Deeney's Wembley guests
» Watford : 25/05/2013 12:45:00
Will there be Trouble at Mills?
» Burnley : 25/05/2013 12:42:00
Sammon Aims For More Goals
» Derby County : 25/05/2013 12:00:00
LUFC On This Day - 25th May
» Leeds Utd : 25/05/2013 09:42:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Will we miss McCann?
Suggested By:  Vital Burnley Admin
Yes 30%
No 70%