UK time is: 09:47:11
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Can We Eckersley Like Agree a Fee!

The Clarets signed Richard Eckersley from Manchester United in the summer but have yet to agree a fee for the defender.

Eckersley is aged 20 so the Bosman Ruling rules related to compensation applies.

If players are under 23, then the club losing out are entitled to compensation and if a fee can't be agreed between the clubs then the matter is decided at a tribunal.

Manchester United despite all their money would appear to be digging their heels in for a large amount of compo; one that the Clarets are not prepared to pay. It therefore looks like the only alternative will be to go to a tribunal, probably something both clubs, certainly Burnley would not have wanted to do.

It is pure speculation but the Clarets value of the player is beleived to be in the order of 250,000 whereas United are believed to have a figure nearer 2 million in mind.

Chief Executive, Paul Fletcher speaking to the Lancashire Telegraph about the situation said:

"There`s a reasonable chance it will go to a tribunal. We`re not a million miles apart on a fee, but it is a sizeable distance. It`s all down to people`s opinions.Right the way through, everything we do at the football club we back our manager. He sees him as one figure, and Manchester United see him as another, and we`ve valued him as a lot less than they have. We just hope that, if it does go to a tribunal, that we get a fair judgement."

Eckersley turned down the offer of a new contract at Manchester United instead preferring to get a better chance of first team action in the top flight with Burnley. He signed a four-year deal but has yet to breakthrough into the Clarets first team being seen as more of a long-term prospect.

He made his debut in the Carling Cup second round game at Hartlepool, a match we won 2-1 after coming from behind. It was not a good night for Eckersley though having been sent-off after picking up two yellows.

There is better news on David Edgar, who is in a similar situation after signing in ther close season from Newcastle. Fletcher indicated they are close to agreeing a fee with a tribunal not looking necessary.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



*Try Vital Mobile FOR FREE for the latest news, scores, fixtures and so much more*

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: turfmanphil Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday September 16 2009

Time: 12:35PM

Your Comments

Bloody stingy Man U!! Grrrrrrrrrrrr
turfmanphil
If we had only budgeted say 500k for his signing - and the tribunal says 2m - What happens? Are we stuck with it?
Claretdale
Yep, I think so and I would be worried that a tribunal would be scared of upsetting the mighty Man U but we shall see
turfmanphil
It does concern me a little. When you buy something it is usually related to price. ie. I am happy to go to Liverpool for 36, but not for 136. Surely this is the same? We are happy to buy RE for 500k, but not for 2m! Should this not have been sorted out earlier?
Claretdale
Guess this is just standard procedure for Man U, lets face it they are in terrible debt compared to BFC but the FA etc let them get away with it! Probably not sour grapes after we beat them but I suspect this has more to do with lawyers and big business rather than Sir Alex's wishes. I am not sure BFC would have budgetted low for this one, they probably knew they might have to pay up to 2 m but hoped they could negotiate downwards
turfmanphil
Tmp speaks wise words, methinks. I would be surprised, no shocked, if Bfc's lawyers hadn't advised the Bfc Board to budget for the worst and hope for the best. But who knows? Meanwhile, it occurs to me that we may have seen less of both Eck and Ed to date than would have been the case if these negotiations had already been concluded. Sitting them on the bench may have been a deliberate stance of saying we 'we are pleased to have them, but not THAT pleased'. As they used to say in Burnley... lawd knows.
Couch Potato
I am not surprised about this news I think it was inevitable!
8clarets8
I think if you take what we paid for Chrissy Eagles from the same club and then look at this signing I would rule a fee of 683,000. Worked out with amazing mathematical equations and reverse logic. Simples!!!
VinRogue
Do I need a slide rule? ;-)
turfmanphil
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Burnley Articles

Oh My God Chelsea! Here We Go! (Sunday August 17 2014)

Owls Flying To Turf! (Saturday August 16 2014)

Just the Ticket-A Trip to the Palace! (Saturday August 16 2014)

Burnley Get A Ward! (Saturday August 16 2014)

Fans To March Demanding Fairer Prices (Tuesday August 12 2014)

Just the Ticket-Swansea Boyo! (Sunday August 10 2014)

Victory over Verona for Clarets! (Sunday August 10 2014)

Archived Burnley Articles

List All Vital Burnley Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Burnley 1 - 3 Chelsea

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Man Utd 1 0 0 1 -1 0
15. Southampton 1 0 0 1 -1 0
16. Q.P.R. 1 0 0 1 -1 0
17. Stoke 1 0 0 1 -1 0
18. West Ham 1 0 0 1 -1 0
19. Burnley 1 0 0 1 -2 0
20. Newcastle 1 0 0 1 -2 0

Breaking League News

Everton target Spurs midfielder
Everton : 20/08/2014 09:37:00
Chelsea Out to Sign Arsenal Target?
Chelsea : 20/08/2014 07:26:00
Courtois Salary Hike!
Chelsea : 20/08/2014 07:25:00
Courtois: Cech is nice to me...hope he stays!
Chelsea : 20/08/2014 00:40:00
No Champions League Turkish Delight
Arsenal : 20/08/2014 00:34:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Which striker with Clarets connections will score the most goals this season?
Suggested By:  8clarets8
Danny Ings 73%
Steven Fletcher 11%
Charlie Austin 5%
Jay Rodriguez 11%
David Nugent 0%