Date:Monday January 26 2009
Burnley, according to the Daily Mirror, will be writing to the Football League to clarify whether Jermain Defoe was eligible to play for Tottenham in the Carling Cup semi-final. Defoe was in the starting eleven for the second leg and indeed scored the second Spurs goal in that heartbreak last two minutes of extra time.
Defoe was paraded in front of the crowd before the start of the first leg at White Hart Lane having supposedly signed from Portsmouth.
He did not of course appear in that game as he had signed too late in the day.
However it would also appear that although he had signed a deal he had not been officially registered before the start of the first leg which Spurs ultimately won 4-1.
The Clarets are therefore seeking clarification as to whether the player was eligible to play in the second leg of the tie if he was not eligible in the first.
It is believed that the rules state that players must be signed before the 'tie' starts.
The 'tie' therefore presumably applies to both legs since they are part of the one final result with aggregate scores being taken into account.
This will form the basis of the Clarets case and they may have a point. The implications could be hugely significant if Defoe is found to be not eligible to play.
The heartbreak of Wednesday night last week when the Clarets after 90 minutes were leading 3-0 before Spurs scored two goals in the last two minutes of extra time is still being felt by all Clarets fans. The 6-4 aggregate win with Spurs booking a Carling Cup Final trip to Wembley still wrangles at the back of all Clarets fans' minds.
If the case is proven , could this mean it is the Clarets who will be going to Wembley? We are a long way from that at the moment but the law is the law and it will be interesting to see how this enquiry develops.
It would be rough justice on Spurs if their Wembley final is taken away from them but then it also seems rough justice at the moment for the Clarets.
It is only the Carling Cup that has this bizarre extra time ruling when aggregate scores are level after 90 minutes of the second leg. Surely if away goals count double, the Clarets won this match after 90 minutes and it is clear that the crazy rule of having to play 30 minutes of extra time hugely favours the team that is first out of the hat,playing the first leg at home.
In terms of the Carling Cup rules on this issue though,Spurs won fairly and squarely and the Clarets knew the rules, no matter how unfair they seemed.
However the Defoe situation is another matter and a potentially serious one that needs to be urgently clarified. I would not feel totally comfortable if we got to Wembley by the back door although I do think justice and fairness would be restored.
Date:Monday January 26 2009
Saints defeat but rest lose too!! (Monday March 23 2015)
Audio - Dyche On Southampton Penalty Decision (Sunday March 22 2015)
Stats: Southampton v Burnley (Saturday March 21 2015)
The Burnley Walking Wounded - Injury Table (Friday March 20 2015)
Buoyant Burnley Marching into St Marys! (Wednesday March 18 2015)
Petition to FA to #stopdiving in Football (Tuesday March 17 2015)
Turf Titbits (Tuesday March 17 2015)
Burnley Boyd Up by City Win, By George! (Sunday March 15 2015)
My Gawd Footy Life is Hard...City Next! (Saturday March 14 2015)
The Late Liverpool Echo! (Saturday March 14 2015)
|15. Hull City||30||6||10||14||-12||28|
|16. Aston Villa||30||7||7||16||-20||28|
|20. Leicester City||29||4||7||18||-21||19|
|Do Tiendalli & Richards' Futures Lie At Swansea?
» Swansea : 26/03/2015 20:53:00
|Sakho on Non-EU Players
» West Ham : 26/03/2015 19:28:01
|Appiah With Reading Spell
» Crystal Palace : 26/03/2015 19:16:00
|Williams amp; Fryers Make Ipswich Move
» Crystal Palace : 26/03/2015 19:13:00
|Burke Heads To Notts County
» Aston Villa : 26/03/2015 19:07:01