UK time is: 08:03:33
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Hornets Swarm Around Eagles Nest Egg

Chris Eagles signed for the Clarets last week for an undisclosed fee. It is believed the fee involved was in seven figures with reports of 1.3 million before the signing was confirmed.

The club are keeping tight lipped on the fee involved and have not stated that the deal was a record transfer for the club, previously set earlier in the Summer when they signed Martin Paterson from Scunthorpe.

Paterson signed for an initial 1m with a further 300k dependent on appearances.

We can safely assume a similar fee with add odds was paid for Eagles but to what extent we will probably never know although one club that will be keen to find out are Watford.

Chris Eagles was a youth player at Watford between 1998-2000 and left aged only 14 to join Manchester United's Academy.

The attacking midfielder spent seven years at Old Trafford but never really established himself as a regular first team choice, often finding himself out on loan including two spells with his former club, Watford in 2005 and 2006.

Watford though are now due compensation after the player signed for the Clarets.

The compensation package was agreed between Manchester United and Watford some time after Eagles was already at Old Trafford and formed part of the deal that saw Danny Webber go in the opposite direction in July 2003.

The local paper, the Watford Observer understands that the Hornets will receive 12.5 per cent of any fee over and above 200,000. The Hornets look set therefore to receive about 125,000 and no doubt cynical fans will now sense this is one reason why the fee remained undisclosed.

Vital Burnley wish to thank Burnley FC for the use of the photograph




Join the FREE Telegraph Championship Fantasy Football League!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: turfmanphil Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday August 1 2008

Time: 7:51AM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
All very interesting! Wonder what deal we got when Man U took John Cofie off our hands?
turfmanphil
Report Abuse
01/08/2008 07:56:00

We paid substantially more than 1.3 million, trust me. Although it's interesting you brought up the Cofie deal. Which did help with this transaction, albeit indirectly.
Parrotclete
Report Abuse
01/08/2008 10:25:00

I did wonder if there was any link to the Cofie deal. Could be a carbon copy of the Eagles/Webber affair
turfmanphil
Report Abuse
01/08/2008 11:06:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Burnley Articles

Anfield Beckons Now! (Tuesday March 3 2015)

Swans Fly to Burnley, Boyo! (Saturday February 28 2015)

More Sky Tinkering With Fixtures! (Monday February 23 2015)

The Special One versus The Ginger One! (Wednesday February 18 2015)

New TV Deal Challenge (Wednesday February 18 2015)

Archived Burnley Articles

List All Vital Burnley Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Liverpool 2 - 0 Burnley
Burnley 0 - 1 Swansea
Chelsea 1 - 1 Burnley
Man Utd 3 - 1 Burnley
Burnley 2 - 2 WBA
Sunderland 2 - 0 Burnley

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Everton 28 6 10 12 -8 28
15. Hull City 28 6 9 13 -11 27
16. Sunderland 28 4 14 10 -16 26
17. Aston Villa 28 6 7 15 -23 25
18. Q.P.R. 27 6 4 17 -19 22
19. Burnley 28 4 10 14 -22 22
20. Leicester City 27 4 6 17 -20 18

Breaking League News

Wenger Praises Sanchez' Mental Strength
Arsenal : 05/03/2015 07:46:00
Arsenal : 05/03/2015 07:37:00
Man Utd : 05/03/2015 07:19:01
West Ham : 05/03/2015 07:11:00
Chelsea : 05/03/2015 07:05:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

That Barnes incident against Matic.What did you think?
Suggested By:  Vital Burnley Admin
Much ado about nothing! 44%
Rode his luck 7%
Equivocal, not sure! 21%
Definite foul, yellow card fair 7%
Blatant foul should have been sent off 21%